STRUCTURAL FEATURES OF CORPORATE EDUCATION IN THE USA
Keywords:
corporate education, insourced model, outsourced model, hybrid model, USA
Abstract
The article analyzes the structural features of corporate training in the United States which can be conducted involving internal resources of the organization (insourced model), external providers (outsourced model) and combining internal resources with external suppliers of educational services (hybrid model). It was found that the main external providers of educational services are colleges, universities, professional associations, manufacturers of complex equipment, consulting companies
References
1. Baron, J. Strategic human resources: Frameworks for general managers/ J. Baron, D. Kreps. – New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1999. – xxi, 602 p.
2. Callery M. The Status of Training Structure in Fortune 500 Corporations: A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy / M. Callery. – University of Minnesota, Graduate School, 2001. – xviii, 219 p.
3. Carnevale A. Training the technical work force / Carnevale A., Gainer L., Schulz E. – San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1990. – xxii, 196 p.
4. Lewin D. Human resource management: An economic approach/ D. Lewin, D. Mitchell. – Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing, 1995. – vii, 760 p.
5. Mabey C. Strategic human resource management / C. Mabey, G. Salaman. – Oxford, UK; Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 1995. – 502p.
6. McLagan P. Models for HRD practice / P. McLagan // Training & Development Journal. – 1989. – Vol. 43, No 9. – P. 49–59.
7. Nadler L. Developing human resources / L. Nadler, Z. Nadler. – San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1989. – xxvi, 298 p.
8. Treichler D. A comparison of corporate and noncorporate adult education as a vehicle for organizational capability migration: A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education / D. Treichler. – Binghamton University, State University of New York, Graduate School, 2000. – 355 p.
2. Callery M. The Status of Training Structure in Fortune 500 Corporations: A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy / M. Callery. – University of Minnesota, Graduate School, 2001. – xviii, 219 p.
3. Carnevale A. Training the technical work force / Carnevale A., Gainer L., Schulz E. – San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1990. – xxii, 196 p.
4. Lewin D. Human resource management: An economic approach/ D. Lewin, D. Mitchell. – Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing, 1995. – vii, 760 p.
5. Mabey C. Strategic human resource management / C. Mabey, G. Salaman. – Oxford, UK; Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 1995. – 502p.
6. McLagan P. Models for HRD practice / P. McLagan // Training & Development Journal. – 1989. – Vol. 43, No 9. – P. 49–59.
7. Nadler L. Developing human resources / L. Nadler, Z. Nadler. – San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1989. – xxvi, 298 p.
8. Treichler D. A comparison of corporate and noncorporate adult education as a vehicle for organizational capability migration: A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education / D. Treichler. – Binghamton University, State University of New York, Graduate School, 2000. – 355 p.
Published
2016-12-26
Pages
136-140
Section
СЕКЦІЯ 4 ТЕОРІЯ І МЕТОДИКА ПРОФЕСІЙНОЇ ОСВІТИ
