COMPARATIVE PEDAGOGICAL RESEARCH OF THE SYSTEM OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION OF TEACHERS IN THE USA

  • С.І. Шандрук
Keywords: comparative pedagogical research, comparative analysis, system of professional education of teachers

Abstract

Comparative pedagogical research of the system of professional education of teachers with
the purpose of careful, systematic study of international experience of education development, and
comparison with the national one; search of ways of introduction of the best pedagogical education
experience of humanity into practice of national pedagogical education; prognostication of possible
progress of national and world educational systems trends is conducted in this article.

References

1. Бражник Е.И. Особенности методологии сравнительных педагогических исследований.
Електронний ресурс: http://www.emissia.org/offline/2005/975.htm.
2. Закон України “Про освіту” // Освіта. – 21 серп. 1996 р. – № 43-44 (221-222). – С. 6 – 11.
3. Митина В.С. Развитие сравнительной педагогики в США // Методологические проблемы
сравнительной педагогики. – М., 1991. – 93 с.
4. Сисоєва С.О. Інтерактивні технології навчання дорослих: навчально-методичний посібник /
С.О. Сисоєва; НАПН України, Ін-т педагогічної освіти і освіти дорослих. – К.: ВД “ЕКМО”,
2011. – 320 с.
5. Alexander R. J. (2001). Border crossings: Towards a comparative pedagogy.// Comparative
Education. – 37(4), – 2001. – Р.507-523.
6. Аltbach P.G., Kelly G.P. New Approaches to Comparative Education. – Chicago and London: The
University of Chicago Press, 1986. – 336 p.
7. Aronowitz S., & Giroux H. A. Postmodern education: Politics, culture, and social criticism. –
Minneapolis: university of Minnesota Press. – 1991. – 199 р.
8. Baker D. P., & LeTendre G. K. (2005). National Differences, – Global Similarities: World Culture
and the Future of Schooling. – 2005. – 194 р.
9. Comparative Education, Border Pedagogy, And Teacher Education in an Age of Internationalisation.
Режим доступу: http://newcastle-au.academia.edu/RobertParkes/Papers/97690/Comparative_
Education_Border_Pedagogy_and_Teacher_Education_in_an_Age_of_Internationalisation.
10. Fairbrother G. P. Comparison to what end? Maximizing the potential of comparative education
research.// Comparative Education, 41(1), – 2005. – Р.5-24.
11. Giroux H. A. Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York:
Routledge. Режим доступу: www.jstor.org/stable/1425099.
12. Jones, P. W. (2007). Education and world order.// Comparative Education, 43(3), – 2007. – Р.325-
337.
13. Kaplan A. The conduct of Inquiry. Електронний ресурс: www.worldcat.org/.../conduct-ofinquiry.../.

14. Klees S. J. Presidential Address: Reflections on Theory, Method, and Practice in Comparative and
International Education. // Comparative Education Review, 52(3), – 2008. – Р.301-328.
15. Miles M. B and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. –Thousand Oaks:Sage
Publications. – 1994. – 337 р.
16. Muller Detlef K., Ringer Fritz K., Simon Brian. The rise of the modern educational system:
structural change and social reproduction 1870-1920. – Cambridge University Press, – 1987. – 264p.
17. Stanley W. B. (1992). Curriculum for utopia: Social reconstructionism and critical pedagogy in the
postmodern era. – New York: State University of New York Press. – 1992. – 167р.
18. World-systems Analysis in Comparative Education: An Alternative to Cosmopolitanism.
Електронний ресурс: http://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/Issues/12.01/12_01_Griffiths_Knezevic.html.
Published
2011-10-31
Pages
44-49
Section
РОЗДІЛ 1. МЕТОДОЛОГІЯ ТА ІСТОРІЯ ПЕДАГОГІКИ