ENHANCING LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION: FACTORS AND METHODOLOGY
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to identify factors and methods enhancing the quality of learning in a university setting. It is pointed out that an overcritical attitude towards learners’ incompetent public performance may cause anxiety and hinder their learning. However, group participation facilitates developing students’ self-expression and life skills. Traditional views on teaching are evaluated with regard to the latest pedagogical trends. The methodology of the paper relies on observation of the educational process, theoretical analysis of common and emerging frameworks for teaching English as a second language in a university setting, as well as synthesis, and generalization of research literature findings. The paper demonstrates how a traditional framework for teaching English as a second language can be modified to accommodate learners’ needs and investigates how innovative methods and technologies affect teaching of a foreign language and development of students’ foreign language competence. It is shown that lessons incorporating pre-communicative and communicative activities can be structured differently. The key to successful learning by a group of students is to take into consideration the quality of tasks and to present materials in a flexible manner to the learners. Our examples are based on fundamental principles, such as a variety of tasks, repetition and internationalization of the content. For warm-up or pre-communicative activities, we choose tasks preparing students for speaking and building their language competence. A number of “silent” activities enable learners to perform more or less simultaneously in order to lay the foundation for their internal language representation in an atmosphere free from anxiety and distraction. After completing exercises, students are expected to utilize previously learned grammar and vocabulary in their speech. In conclusion, we reiterate that successful learning takes place when external and internal factors are accounted for. Modern technologies are an effective extension of in-class learning for improving students’ pronunciation, enriching their vocabulary, and developing their speaking and writing skills.
References
2. Blake, R. (2016). Technology and four skills. Language Learning & Technology, 20 (2), 129–142.
3. Canagarajah, S. (2002). Multilingual writers and the academic community: Towards a critical relationship. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1 (1), 29–44.
4. Care, E., Anderson K. & Kim H. (2016). Visualizing the breadth of skill movement across education systems. Skills for a changing world. Retrieved from: https://www.brookings.edu/research/visualizing-the-breadth-of-skills-movement-across-education-systems (date of access: 26.04.2021).
5. CASEL (Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning). Retrieved from: www.casel.org (date of access: 26.04.2021).
6. Conley, C. (2015). SEL in Higher Education. Handbook of Social and Emotional Learning. Research and Practice, Faculty Publications, 197–212. Retrieved from: https://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://search.yahoo.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1035&context=psychology_facpubs (date of access:26.04.2021).
7. De Koning, B., & Van der Schoot, M. (2013). Becoming Part of the Story! Refueling the Interest in Visualization Strategies for Reading Comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 25 (2), 261–287. Retrieved April 22, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43549775 (date of access: 26.04.2021).
8. Duzhyk, N.S. (2020). Employing Ethical Approach to Writing in Academic Settings. Vcheni zapysky TNU im. V.I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Filolohiia. Sotsialni komunikatsii. Tom 31 (70), № 1, Ch. 2. S. 63–67.
9. Dymnicki, A. (2013). Improving College and Career Readiness by Incorporation Social and Emotional Learning. Retrieved from: https://ccrscenter.org/sites/default/files/Improving%20College%20and%20Career%20Readiness%20by%20Incorporating%20Social%20and%20Emotional%20Learning_0.pdf (date of access: 26.04.2021).
10. Fushino, Kumiko (2010). Casual Relationships between Communication, Confidence, Beliefs about Group Work, and Willingness to Communicate in Foreign Language Group Work. TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 44. No. 4, 700–724.
11. Green, C.S., Bavelier, D. (2008). Exercising Your Brain: A Review of Human Brain Plasticity and Training-Induced Learning. Psychology and Aging. Vol. 23. No. 4, 692–701.
12. Kovach, Nadia (2021). What is Augmented Reality (AR) and how does it work. Retrieved April 20, 2021 from: https://thinkmobiles.com/blog/what-is-augmented-reality (date of access: 26.04.2021).
13. Littlewood, William (1984). Foreign and Second Language Learning. Cambridge University Press.
14. Maftoon, P., & Ziafar, M. (2013). Effective Factors in Interactions within Japanese EFL Classrooms. The Clearing House, 86(2), 74–79. Retrieved February 19, 2021 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43999320 (date of access: 26.04.2021).
15. Morgan, B. (2009). Fostering transformative practitioners for critical EAP: possibilities and challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8 (2), 86–99.
16. Nguyen, T., Hwang, W., Pham, X., & Ma, Z. (2018). User-Oriented EFL Speaking through Application and Exercise: Instant Speech Translation and Shadowing in Authentic Context. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21 (4), 129–142. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26511544 (date of access: 26.04.2021).
17. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Wang N. et al (2012). Impact of a College Freshmen Social and Emotional Learning Curriculum on Student Learning Outcomes: An Exploratory Study. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice. Vol. 9. No. 2. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ984909.pdf (date of access: 26.04.2021).
19. Yang, J., & Quadir, B. (2018). Effects of Prior Knowledge on Learning Performance and Anxiety in English Learning Online Role-Playing Game. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21 (3), 174–185. Retrieved April 20, 2021, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458516 (date of access: 26.04.2021).