SOCIAL DETERMINANTS IN RECOGNIZING HIGHER EDUCATION DIPLOMAS
Abstract
Aim. This article explores higher education diplomas recognized based on their social determinants across Europe. Academic mobility, the application of international educational standards, cultural and linguistic barriers, and the principle of equal access to education are the key factors forming the internationalization process in education. Methodology. Qualitative analysis is applied to international legal frameworks, educational policy documents, and institutional practices that regulate diploma recognition. Using comparative data and official sources, it explores initiatives like the Bologna Process, Lisbon Convention, and Erasmus+ to determine their effect on harmonizing higher education and academic cooperation.Results. Academic mobility is a key instrument that corporations use to foster cross-border partnerships and scientific exchange. Backed by various EU actions, it encourages educational systems to align with one another and streamlines coordination. However, it still struggles with bureaucratic speed bumps, and concern about brain drain hangs over the EU. Quality and comparability between institutions are still (and always will be) closely monitored via accreditation. Standards, trust, and transparency: bodies like ENQA and Ukraine’s NAHEQA maintain standards and mutual trust, while tools such as the ESG and EQF facilitate openness and mobility. The new study also explains how differences in language and culture stand in the way of diplomas being recognized. Fostering inclusivity and intercultural dialogue – the crux of multilingualism initiatives, including the European Centre for Modern Languages and EU multilingualism policies – is key to integrating diverse learners and professionals.Conclusions. As a fundamental value of the EU, access to education is affirmed. Still, restrictive migration and security policies result in the denial of access to education to vulnerable groups, and in particular to refugees and migrants. The piece notes that as EU strategies evolve, they must address these tensions to provide a fair recognition of qualifications while being attentive to national concerns and respecting the universal right to education and career development in an interconnected world.
References
2. Квіт С., Єременко О. Річний звіт Національного агентства із забезпечення якості вищої освіти за 2020 рік. Київ: НАЗЯВО, 2021.
3. Рибачук О. Освіта та європейська інтеграція: Вплив вищої освіти на громадську думку про ЄС. Освітній вісник України. 2021. № 17(2). С. 98–112.
4. Страшнюк С., Петрова І. Болонський процес і якість освіти: досвід впровадження у вищих навчальних закладах України. Харків: ХНУ імені В.Н. Каразіна, 2018.
5. Фінікова Т., Шарова О. Університетська автономія та якість освіти: європейський досвід для України. Київ: Таксон, 2018.
6. Aerne A., Trampusch C. Higher Education and Economic Growth: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
7. Costes N., Crozier F., Cullen P. et al. Quality Procedures in the European Higher Education Area and Beyond – Second ENQA Survey. ENQA Occasional Papers. 2008. No. 14.
8. Council of Europe. Lisbon Recognition Convention: Ensuring Fair Recognition of Qualifications in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2020.
9. Dąbrowski M., Stead D., Mashhoodi B. EU cohesion policy can’t buy me love? Exploring the regional determinants of EU image. Regional Science Policy & Practice. 2019. Vol. 11, No. 4. P. 695–712.
10. European Commission. Recognition of Qualifications for Migrants in the EU: Policy Challenges and Solutions. Brussels: European Commission, 2017.
11. European Commission. Recognition and valida- tion of foreign qualifications and skills in Poland, with particular focus on qualifications and skills from Ukraine (Annex 9: Informative registry and roadmap). Director- ate-General for Structural Reform Support. 2023. https://reform-support.ec.europa.eu/document/download/2d14fd4f-3b69-4467-8ce0-af643be34fb7_cs?filename=Annex+9_Report%2C+informative+registry+and+roadmap_ENG.pdf
12. Herbaut E., Geven K., Smith R. The Bologna Process and its Impact on Higher Education: Achievements and Challenges. Higher Education Policy. 2021. Vol. 34, No. 2. P. 139–159.
13. Hou, A. Y.-C. Qualification recognition of joint degrees in Europe and Asia in the era of massifica- tion. In K. Mok (Ed.), Managing international connec- tivity, diversity of learning and changing labour mar- kets, Higher Education in Asia: Quality, Excellence, and Governance. Springer. 2017. pp. 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1736-0_4
14. Kalantaryan, S., & Salamońska, J. Where migration meets education: Case study of policies referring to the mobility of the highly skilled. In S. K. St. John & M. Murphy (Eds.), Education and public policy in the European Union, Palgrave Macmillan. 2019. pp. 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04230-1_3
15. Keeves J.P., Watanabe R. The International Handbook of Educational Research in the Global Era. Springer, 2003.
16. Kvit S. Higher Education in Ukraine: Reform, Bologna Process, and Internationalization. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo Naukova Dumka, 2019.
17. Mazrekaj D., Oude Lansink A., Hoxhaj R. Erasmus+ and Its Role in International Mobility: Evidence from Eastern Europe. Journal of Educational Policy. 2018. Vol. 33, No. 4. P. 502–521.
18. Ribeiro P. Migration, security, and higher education: Challenges in the EU’s externalization policies. Journal of European Policy Studies. 2022. Vol. 29, No. 1. P. 45–62.
19. Spina N. Bounded inclusion: race, migration and the making of the European educational space. Comparative and International Education. 2020. Vol. 49, No. 1. P. 1–19.
20. Teichler U. International Student Mobility and Recognition Policies in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
21. UNESCO. Global Convention on the Recognition of Qualifications concerning Higher Education. Paris: UNESCO, 2023.
22. Westerheijden D.F., Stensaker B., Rosa M.J. (Eds.). Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007. 294 p.
