КОМПЕТЕНТНІСНИЙ ПІДХІД В ЕПОХУ «ГІПЕРМОДЕРНА»
Ключові слова:
компетентність, компетентнісний підхід, ризоморфність, деконструкція, гіпермодерн
Анотація
The article focuses on the issues of the competency-based educational strategy performance in a hypermodern reality. The social concept of «liquid» reality is stated to require appropriate methodological support. The teaching/learning competence-centered ideologeme, as a polymorphic open system, is meant to be the most relevant to ‘liquid times».
Посилання
1. Зигмунт Бауман Сбегающее Время. Новую реальность нужно просто принять // Образование [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа : http://argumentua.com/stati/sbegayushchee-vremya-zigmunt-bauman-novuyurealnost-nuzhno-prosto-prinyat.
2. Цукерман Г.А., Ермакова И.В. Развивающие эффекты системы Д.Б. Эльконина – В.В. Давыдова / Г.А. Цукерман, И.В.Ермакова // Психологическая наука и образование. – 2003. – № 4. – С. 56–73.
3. Шелтен А. Введение в профессиональную педагогику / А. Шелтен. – Екатеринбург : УГППУ, 1997. – 287 с.
4. Barnett R. The Limits of Competence: Knowledge, Higher Education and Society. – Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, 1994. – 207 p.
5. Bauman Z. Liquid modern challenges to education. Lecture given at the Coimbra Group Annual Conference – Padova, 26 May, 2011. [Electronic resource]. Available at : http://test.padovauniversitypress.it/system/files/field/ebook/Bauman_liquid-modern-challenges_0.pdf.
6. Klemp G. O. (1980). The Assessment of Occupational Competence. Washington, DC.: Report to the National Institute of Education. – 28 p.
7. Kuhn T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. [Electronic resource]. Available at:http://projektintegracija.pravo.hr/_download/repository/Kuhn_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions.pdf.
8. Liquid modernity? Understanding Society. Innovative thinking about a global world. [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://understandingsociety.blogspot.com/2008/11/plasticity-of-social.html.
9. McClelland D. (1973). Testing for Competence rather than for intelligence // American Psychologist. – 1973, Vol. 28, – № 1. – P. 1–14.
10. Prigogine I., Stengers I. (1984). Order Out of Chaos. Man’s new dialogue with nature.[Electronic resource]. Available at: https://deterritorialinvestigations.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org.pdf.
11. Sutherland T. «Liquid Networks and the Metaphysics of Flux: Ontologies of Flow in an Age of Speed and Mobility», Theory, Culture and Society, 30 (5): 3-23.
12. Westera, W. Competences in education: A confusion of tongues./ W. Westera //Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2001. – Vol.33. – No.1. – P. 75–88.
13. White R.W. Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence // Psychological Review. – 1959. – Vol. 66, – No. 5. – Р. 297–333.
2. Цукерман Г.А., Ермакова И.В. Развивающие эффекты системы Д.Б. Эльконина – В.В. Давыдова / Г.А. Цукерман, И.В.Ермакова // Психологическая наука и образование. – 2003. – № 4. – С. 56–73.
3. Шелтен А. Введение в профессиональную педагогику / А. Шелтен. – Екатеринбург : УГППУ, 1997. – 287 с.
4. Barnett R. The Limits of Competence: Knowledge, Higher Education and Society. – Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, 1994. – 207 p.
5. Bauman Z. Liquid modern challenges to education. Lecture given at the Coimbra Group Annual Conference – Padova, 26 May, 2011. [Electronic resource]. Available at : http://test.padovauniversitypress.it/system/files/field/ebook/Bauman_liquid-modern-challenges_0.pdf.
6. Klemp G. O. (1980). The Assessment of Occupational Competence. Washington, DC.: Report to the National Institute of Education. – 28 p.
7. Kuhn T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. [Electronic resource]. Available at:http://projektintegracija.pravo.hr/_download/repository/Kuhn_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions.pdf.
8. Liquid modernity? Understanding Society. Innovative thinking about a global world. [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://understandingsociety.blogspot.com/2008/11/plasticity-of-social.html.
9. McClelland D. (1973). Testing for Competence rather than for intelligence // American Psychologist. – 1973, Vol. 28, – № 1. – P. 1–14.
10. Prigogine I., Stengers I. (1984). Order Out of Chaos. Man’s new dialogue with nature.[Electronic resource]. Available at: https://deterritorialinvestigations.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org.pdf.
11. Sutherland T. «Liquid Networks and the Metaphysics of Flux: Ontologies of Flow in an Age of Speed and Mobility», Theory, Culture and Society, 30 (5): 3-23.
12. Westera, W. Competences in education: A confusion of tongues./ W. Westera //Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2001. – Vol.33. – No.1. – P. 75–88.
13. White R.W. Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence // Psychological Review. – 1959. – Vol. 66, – No. 5. – Р. 297–333.
Опубліковано
2016-10-31
Сторінки
30-34
Розділ
СЕКЦІЯ 1 МЕТОДОЛОГІЯ ТА ІСТОРІЯ ПЕДАГОГІКИ
